AnyBook4Less.com	Find the Best Price on the Web Order from a Major Online Bookstore
Home  |  Store List  |  FAQ  |  Contact Us  |
Ultimate Book Price Comparison Engine Save Your Time And Money Keyword AuthorISBN

Title: Marcia Clark: Her Private Trials and Public Triumps by Clifford L. Linedecker ISBN: 0-7860-0218-2 Publisher: Pinnacle Books Pub. Date: May, 1995 Format: Paperback Volumes: 1 List Price(USD): $5.99

Your Country USA Canada United Kingdom Australia Austria Belgium France Germany Italy Netherlands Switzerland Currency AutoUSD CAD GBP EUR AUD CHF Delivery Only cheapest delivery All delivery options Include Used Books Are you a club member of: Barnes and Noble Books A Million Chapters.Indigo.ca

Average Customer Rating: 3 (1 review)

Rating: 3
Summary: Marcia Clark: The Couragous Woman
Comment: Marcia Clark: Her Private Trials and Public Triumps, by Clifford L. Linedecker takes an exclusive look at one of the greatest lawyers involved in the Case of The People v.s O.J. Simpson.

One of the key attorney's in the "Trial of the Century" was Marcia Clark. Ms. Clark was on the case from day one. When the evidence against O.J. Simpson begain to pile up she began to work stagities to convict O.J Simpson. Clark along with her male counterparts worked 3/4 days trying to put all of the pieces together. Her plan going into the case was to show that O.J. had a history of abusing Nicole Brown, and stalking Ronald Goldman. Although Marica did a great job on the Case against Simpson her Private life turned public, and allowed her enemies, and the greedy, tastless, tabloid press take advantage of there personal demintions. Marica's ex husband decided to try and take her son away from her in the middle of the trial. Although she prevailed it cause her great pain that never went away. And if that was not enough there were rumors the she and Christoper Darden were sleeping together. The press had a field day trying to unjustly denounce Marcia Clark.

In spite of her greatest attempts to convict O.J. by using her "mountain of evidence" the evidence proved to be fallible. The defense proved that her case surrond reasonable doubt. For example; the viedo tape played by Johnnie Cochran showed the jurors that the bloody socks were not located by the foot of the bed 15 min. before the police "discovered them". Question. How could the socks be at the foot of the bed, when we see that they were not there 15 minutes before? What about the racism of Mark Furhman. She was told about his racist past and she chose to ignore it, then blame the defense for playing the "race card". Why did she not investigate Mr. Furhman, as she was asked to do? Somebody planned evidence. There was reasonable doubt that forced the jury to aquit O.J. Simpson. The law states that if there is reasonable doubt, you must aquit the acuse! That is the Law, not a race issue!